AN UNBIASED VIEW OF RESPONSIBILITY OF FINDER OF GOODS CASE LAWS

An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws

An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws

Blog Article

When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is normally only finished In the event the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded into the allegations therefore they were perfectly conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Tiny fees apply.

10 . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair to your offender as well as the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, and also the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as being a legally acknowledged conviction. Read more

13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed into the disposal of the instant petition within the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner and also private respondents and will take care of the many aspects of the case and ensure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it demands legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be developed and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a very criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically result in exoneration from departmental charges based around the same factual grounds. Although a writ under Article 199 is obtainable in specific limited situations, it really is generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-analyze witnesses and present his/her defense but did not persuade the department of his/her innocence.

In federal or multi-jurisdictional regulation systems there may possibly exist conflicts between the various lower appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it might be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.

Only the written opinions with the Supreme Court along with the Court of Appeals are routinely out there. Decisions with the decreased (trial) courts usually are not generally published or distributed.

This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mould the relief to really make it appropriate towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or even the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified through the decision in the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case regulation in a very particular court. Indeed, Each and every circuit has its personal set of binding case regulation. Because of this, a judgment rendered within the Ninth Circuit will not be binding in the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.

The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to generally be gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

8. For your reasons stated above, this court finds the petition to become without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend in the comments, and their request is Hence acceded to. All pending applications, if any, will also be dismissed. labor law cases Read more

refers to law that comes from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case law, also known as “common law,” and “case precedent,” gives a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, And the way They're applied in certain types of case.

Report this page